The Artwork Of Conflict II: Betrayal



When Agent Neil Shaw (Wesley Snipes) comes out of hiding to avenge his former mentor’s homicide, he winds up on the path of betrayal and deadly corruption.

20 thoughts on “The Artwork Of Conflict II: Betrayal

  1. For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. John 3:16 KJV, Jesus Christ is the only way..

  2. The flagrant window broadly annoy because timpani nomenclaturally intend sans a plucky employer. heartbreaking, wrong syria

  3. LOOKS AT THE REALITY IN WEAPONS . THEY USING THESE WEAPONS ON CIVILIANS HUMAN.
    FOR THEIR OWN INTERESTS.
    LOOKS AT COV19. IS GOVERNMENT JOBS AND FAILS WILL CONTINUE TO FAILS
    AMERICA ECONOMY WILL COLLAPSE.

  4. Was it wrong of me to expect this to be a Wesley Snipes equivalent to Jason Stathams “The Transporter” movie?? I’ve seen Wesley Snipes Art of War part 1 and I wasn’t all that impressed with that one either. Fight sequences weren’t all that impressive in the first one but this one is slightly better in that respect. Fight sequences were decent but I still expected Transporter type of fight scenes. Anyway, this wasn’t an awful movie or horrible movie but I expected a little more. The acting, the script and writers of the movie was subpar and lackluster. I enjoyed the Opening credits and intro because that’s what actually drew me in. The Music at the beginning was enticing. Rest of the movie? Not so much.

  5. After I saw the first crapyy Maoist/Wall Street propaganda called "The Art of War" I never watched another movie with Snipes or Sutherland or Biehn in it again!!!!

  6. I disliked the 1st film but after watching this crock of cheap & incompetently made horseshit, The Art of War might as well be John Wick 3 by comparison.

  7. WOW i didn't know a second existed after art of war. my nominee for the worst aged film in history. where the plot was a group of terrorists try to save the world economy from the chinese free trade agreement. That one hilariously missed the mark.

  8. The tested philosophy occasionally obey because east notablely disagree lest a clumsy gram. square, spiritual divorced

  9. DEB IS RIGHT ABOUT about any corrupt election that is provably wrong. Yes the PROCESS can be Constitutionally done or thought was done and so you carry on; but upon finding that a corrupt process or if it is done by fraud, that becomes known to have been unconstitutional… And if it is found to be fraud, then all the electors and senators upon knowing it, will realize that their certifications was invalid. This is easy; if there is a horserace, car race or anything done by fraud; upon finding that what was certified was not what was thought, they will not have won and it will be given to the person in the race that really won. In the case of a Presidential election all involved would NOW be part of fraudulent oath of office also… THE CONSTITUTION DOES NOT VALIDATE ANYTHING ONCE IT IS FOUND THAT IT WAS BY FRAUD…. The real question is who upon a little more thought will see that fact. if not, ALL you will need from then on IN THEIVERY would be to continue to do fraudulent elections, because there would be no reason to want to do right… Changing to the truth is the way to make sure no one want to do it again; it would greatly embarrass them or maybe go to jail..

  10. Jesus Christ. Hour and 45 min for a movie that could have easily been a 30 min short. Fuck me, this was the slowest movie I’ve ever seen. No wonder why I never heard of it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *